All the tragic gun violence-related events that took place recently and not so recently led not only to grief but to all sorts of speculation on all levels. The topic has become so widely discussed that everyone has something to say on it: So, given the actuality of the issue, it is only logical that students are often given assignments to write gun control essay, to investigate this pressing question, and to share their opinions in this regard. While everybody agrees that mass shootings should not happen, the gun control as a means to cope with this problem is a controversial approach that polarizes our society.
If history is to be any guide, no matter what the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that the arguments pro and con will be much the same as they always have been. Inlegislation was passed by the Canadian Parliament regulating long guns for the first time, restructuring the availability of firearms, and increasing a variety of penalties.
Canadian firearms law is primarily federal, and "therfore national in scope, while the bulk of the firearms regulation in the United States is at the state level; attempts to introduce stricter leglislation at the federal level are often defeated".
The importance of this issue is that not all North Americans are necessarily supportive of strict gun control as being a feasible alternative to controlling urban violence. There are concerns with the opponents of gun control, that the professional criminal who wants a gun can obtain one, and leaves the average law-abiding citizen helpless in defending themselves against the perils of urban life.
Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans? Or is it privilege? And what are the benefits of having strict gun control laws?
Through the analysis of the writings and reports of academics and experts of gun control and urban violence, it will be possible to examine the issues and theories of the social impact of this issue.
Mundt, of the University of North Carolina, points out that "Crime in America is popularly perceived [in Canada] as something to be expected in a society which has less respect for the rule of law than does Canadian society Inthe Canadian government took the initiative to legislate stricter gun control.
Among the provisions legislated by the Canadian government was a "Firearms Acquisition Certificate" for the purchase of any firearm, and strengthened the "registration requirements for handguns and other restricted weapons The purpose of the leglislation was to reduce the availability of firearms, on the assumption that there is a "positive relationship between availability and use".
The only positive effectMundt, found in the study was the decrease in the use of firearms in robbery with comparion to trends in the United States.
Informed law enforcement officers in Canada, as in the United States, view the "impact of restricting the availability of firearms is more likely to impact on those violent incidents that would not have happened had a weapon been at hand" In an article by Gary A.
Mauser of the Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, he places special emphasis on the attitudes towards firearms displayed by both Canadians and Americans.
According to Mauser, large majorities of the general public in both countries "support gun control legislation while simultaneously believing that they have the right to own firearms" Mauser Despite the similarities, there are apparent differences between the general publics in the two countries.
As Mauser states that "Canadians are more deferent to authority and do not support the use of handguns in self defence to the same extent as Americans". As Mauser points out that "it has been argued that cultural differences account for why Canada has stricter gun control legislation than the United States" Surprisingly enough, nationwide surveys in both Canada and the United States "show remarkable similarity in the public attitude towards firearms and gun control" Both Canada and the United States were originally English colonies, and both have historically had similar patterns of immigration.
Moreover, Canadians are exposed to American television both entertainment and news programming and, Canadians and Americans read many of the same books and magazines. As a result of this, the Canadian public has adopted "much of the American culture".
In an article by Catherine F. Sproule and Deborah J. Kennett of Trent University, they looked at the use of firearms in Canadian homicides between the years of There findings firmly support the conclusion that gun control is beneficial. According to Sproule and Kennett, gun control "may be influencing some suspects to kill by other methods, but it is less likely for these suspects to kill multiple victims".
From the study conducted by Sproule and Kennett the rate of violent crimes was five times greater in the U. S than Canada, and "almost double the rate of firearm use in American than Canadian homicides" In short, the use of firearms "in Canadian homicides has declined since the legislative changes in gun control in ".
A factor to be considered, though, is our national heritage or culture which holds traditions of passiveness and peace unlike the American Frontier heritage. From our textbook, Why Nothing Works, Marvin Harris points out that the "American Constitution guarantees citizens the right to bear arms, and this has made it possible for U.
Marvin Harris indicates that "the high rate of homicide in the United States undoubtedly reflects, to some extent, the estimated 50 million handguns and rifles legally and illegally owned by the American people" As demonstrated in the film: Cops, Guns, and Drugs, the problem with controlling urban violence in the United States is that it is out of proportion in contrast to the available police force.
In his book, The Saturday Night Special, Robert Sherrill explains the cheap, usually illegal, easily concealed handgun that plays a part in so many crimes in the United States.
He reviews the role of guns in American life-from the shoot-outs of the Old West to the street violence of today. According to Sherrill, "most murders occur in shabby neighbourhoods; of the murders in Detroit infor example, occurred in the black slums mostly by handguns".More Americans have died from guns in the United States since than on battlefields of all the wars in American history.
Each year, the number of firearm-related deaths reach almost the equivalent of U.S. casualties in Korean War. The debate over gun control in the United States has waxed and waned over the years, stirred by a series of mass shootings by gunmen in civilian settings.
In particular, the killing of twenty schoolchildren in Newtown, Connecticut, in prompted a new national discussion about gun laws. With this systematic review, we summarize and evaluate studies in which authors measure the association between publicly supported housing assistance programs and child health in the United States.
The American hunting tradition comes from a time when the United States was an agrarian, subsistence nation where hunting was a profession for some, an auxiliary source of food for some settlers, and also a deterrence to animal predators. Information concerning the effect of gun control policies in countries other than the United States.
In the viewpoint of some gun control advocates, the symbolic benefits of gun control are far more important than any expected substantive benefits.
For example, United States .